Archive for the 'Technology' Category

Depends on how you frame it

Kottke on the failed Microsoft/Yahoo deal:

On Jan 31, the day before Microsoft offered $31/share for Yahoo, YHOO was at $19.18/share (market cap: $26.4 billion) and MSFT was at $32.60/share (market cap: $303.6 billion). At the close of trading today, YHOO closed at $24.37/share (market cap: $33.5 billion) and MSFT was at $29.08/share (market cap: $270.8 billion). In other words, the Microsoft offer increased the value of Yahoo! Inc. by more than $7 billion and decreased the value of Microsoft Corporation by almost $33 billion. In still other words, in attempting to take Yahoo by force, they let an amount equal to Yahoo slip through their fingers. Why isn’t anyone writing about Yahoo’s amazing stock gains and Microsoft’s plunge?

It was curious how lots of the coverage, particularly in the tech blogs, was focused on what a disaster this was for Yahoo when, going by the short term numbers at least, it seems more like a problem for Microsoft.


Quote of the Day

I spend quite a bit of time talking about leading-edge Web stuff to mainstream Enterprise types. I have a well-polished explanation for the rise of PHP and Rails and so on: Time To Market. Here’s the sound-bite: “If you and I have the same good idea for a community-based Web site on the same day, and mine is on the air in five months and yours in eight, then you’re dead. And it doesn’t matter if yours is better, because the community has gathered.” Well, Twitter would be the canonical example. They went with Rails because it let them build fast; and they built fast. They suffered terrible pain for months trying to take Rails places it’d never been before; but they fought through it and they’re in a very good place. Smart people tell me that Pownce and Jaiku are slicker and better but who cares? Apparently 140 characters, distributed appropriately, gives you what you need.

Tim Bray, via DF


Two reasons not to get a Macbook Air

1. The good folks at the TSA (please don’t put me on a watch list) might not believe your Air is actually a computer and the ensuing debate might cause you to miss your flight.

2. Its so thin and light that you could accidently throw it out with the newspapers, even if you are a tech writer for a national magazine.

I think I still want one.


The Good Michael Arrington

I generally find TechCrunch to be a worthwhile read, though it frequently lacks the right amount of skepticism when evaluating startups (come back Uncov, we need you! I need you!). Having said that, when Michael Arrington’s on, he’s on. His destruction of new startup YouNoodle yesterday is why I continue to read. YouNoodle claims it can predict which startups will succeed and which will fail and they got themselves a nice NY Times writeup. Arrington wasn’t having any of that, to wit:

The NYT did cover themselves somewhat by bringing in some venture capitalist quotes calling bullshit on the whole thing. “If their tool did such a good job, they’d raise a fund themselves and beat the tar out of us,” said Paul Kedrosky, who didn’t bother to write about the company on his blog.

And he’s exactly right. Just like the people who say they can sell you a book and a seminar to help you get rich quick off of distressed real estate - if these guys found some sort of magic formula that actually predicted the value of a startup down the road, they’d keep the information to themselves and make, well, unlimited amounts of money.

It’s hype and nonsense, and it won’t work. The NYTimes bit on it hard, but our readers are smarter. In a poll that Duncan ran earlier the vast majority say there’s no way YouNoodle can pick winners based on some algorithm.

I propose this as a test - If and when YouNoodle launches this magic predictor thingy, they should run their own founding team through it. If it predicts failure, then it’s spot on and we know it will work.

So far, Goodson says, they haven’t run themselves through the model. Smart move.

See? Now that’s what I want in a review of a startup, brutal honesty. Good job Arrington, lets make this a TechCrunch habit. Still, its a shame you couldn’t land the Uncov guy.


Microsoft offers $44.6 billion for Yahoo

The big news in the tech/business world today is Microsoft’s unsolicited $44.6 billion dollar offer to buy Yahoo. I wouldnt really be affected by the merger directly. I don’t really use any of Yahoo’s or Microsoft’s products. I’m starting to use Flickr and I use Yahoo’s fantasy sports (by far the best) for my leagues but other then those two thats about it. I canceled my Hotmail account years ago. I do use a PC at work but I’ve got an Apple at home that I like more; Google for most of my online stuff.

This seems like a pairing that would be very hard to pull off successfully (something AOL-Time Warner learned the hard way). I can understand joining to fight Google but there has to be a larger purpose then just that, right? And what would happen to all the overlapping products? Would they merge them? Not to mention you’d be talking about a new company with approx. 90,000 employees, thats not nothing. So many questions, I guess it will be interesting to see what happens.


Sick monitor

Alienware monitor

I’m only some what into “techie” things but this monitor, available in the second half of ‘08 from Alienware, is pretty sick. (fist-bump Jess3)

Photo via Kotaku


2 billionth Flickr photo

2 Billionth Flickr photo

The photo above is the 2 billionth photo to be uploaded to Flickr. That’s a lot of photos. Via TechCrunch, who also note as a comparison that there are 4.1 billion photos on Facebook. That’s also a lot of photos.


“Although no one keeps an official count of Google millionaires, it is estimated that 1,000 people each have more than $5 million worth of Google shares from stock grants and stock options”. (ht Techmeme)


A story about Google Earth

A fictional account of the potential powers of Google Earth (via the one and only Joe)


Horny computer users are idiots

How’s that for an eye-catching title? Anyway its true, particularly when you consider this news:

Fake emails claiming to offer nude photographs of Angelina Jolie, Nicole Kidman, Natalie Portman, Milla Jovovich and pixelated videogame babe Lara Croft are behind 80 per cent of computer viruses last month, according to expert

Come on now people. Don’t open attachments unless you know the sender and even then proceed with caution. And if you are opening emails hoping to see some nude celebrities, well you deserve a virus or two.