Eric Boehlert explains how the press is just making crap up about Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama in attempt to fill pages/segments. Also gives a nice little history lesson of recent Democratic Conventions.
Tag Archive for 'hillaryclinton'
A former coworker of mine has an interesting way of thinking about Senator Clinton’s continued efforts to win the Democratic nomination:
HRC is down 100-90 with 1 minute to go in the basketball game. Most of the game has already been played and she is down only 5% of the total score but it is damn hard to net 10 points in one minute of basketball. It is hard enough to score 10 points yourself, but you also have to keep your opponent from scoring. She just won PA which makes her down 9 points. If she loses NC and Indiana, she will be down 13 points, but, the worst part: instead of a minute left, she will be down 13 points with 25 seconds or so.
That sounds right.
Via Dana Goldstein, here’s Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) on the status of the Democratic nomination:
Question: Do you still think the Democratic race can be resolved before the convention?
Reid: Easy.
Q: How is that?
Reid: It will be done.
Q: It just will?
Reid: Yep.
Q: Magically?
Reid: No, it will be done. I had a conversation with Governor Dean (Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean) today. Things are being done.
uh, care to explain a bit more there sir? The suspense is killing me. Dana says this is evidence, along with some recent Nancy Pelosi comments , that Democratic leaders are preparing to tell Senator Clinton to get out of the race. We’ll see I suppose.
In the comments David writes that yesterday’s McCain comment regarding Iran and Al-Qaeda might have been more of a slip of the tongue then anything else. David’s giving McCain a little bit more benefit of the doubt then I’m inclined to, especially in light of the fact that McCain made the same mistake three times in two days. And further, right-wing blogs are up in arms defending McCain, saying what the Senator said was correct. Powerline, RedState, The Weekly Standard, etc.. Matthew Duss has more on that front, but the point is that it might not have been a mistake. In right wing circles at least what McCain said is correct.
Ezra Klein notes this comment by Max Bergmann:
That is not a gaffe. That is called believing something that isn’t true. It is called being confused. And being confused about the differences between Shia and Sunni when claiming that you should be elected president of the United States on your foreign policy knowledge and experience, is simply not okay. This is a big deal.
Exactly. I’ll also recommend reading this from Josh Marshall.
I’d like to note a point made my NBC’s Chuck Todd (via Atrios):
…this was not a one-time slip and so, you know, this just shows you how much bank — how much of the foreign policy experience stuff he’s got in the bank, because had Clinton or Obama done something like this, this would have been played on a loop, over and over, and would have absolutely hurt them politically.
As Blue Texan notes:
It’s almost impossible to imagine the wingnut/media outrage circus if Obama or Clinton had claimed Iran was training al Qaeda. I see Sludge Report headlines like, HOW CAN WE TRUST OBAMA TO FIGHT THE WAR IF HE DOESN’T UNDERSTAND THE ENEMY?, a series of passive-aggressive NOT READY FOR PRIMETIME posts from Glenn Reynolds, declarations by Tweety that the race is already over, grim-faced former generals expressing their disapproval on MSNBC, Fixed News playing the clip over and over and over…
Whats frustrating about Chuck Todd’s comments is that he’s actually IN THE MEDIA. I admire his ability to be self-aware but he is in position to change things and yet most likely will chose not to.
When I first heard this I remembered that a reporter had gone around a while ago asking members of Congress about the differences between Sunnis and Shiites but I couldn’t recall the specifics. Brendon Nyhan helpful remembers that it was CQ’s Jeff Stein.
Via Firedoglake, here’s video of the most recent incident:
And finally, to bring the Democratic nomination into the picture, I would certainly gain new respect for Senator Clinton if she followed Mark Kleinman’s advice (via Drum):
Given McCain’s buffoonish performance in Jordan, wouldn’t this be a good time for Hillary Clinton to say, “Gee, I thought he was ready to be Commander-in-Chief, but it sure doesn’t sound like it. The least we should expect from the President is some basic knowledge about who our enemies are.”
McCain’s supposed “strength” is foreign policy. The fact that he appears to be clueless about it (along with domestic policy, which leaves him with what exactly?) should be mentioned by Democrats more then once.
Tonight Olbermann will deliver his first “Special Comment” that is directed at Democrats, Senator Clinton specially. Obviously I don’t know what he’s going to say but pro-Obama cheerleading on MSNBC has gotten a little over the top and is starting to make me uncomfortable.